Autumn Sale: 20% off almost everything until 24 DecemberSee the sale →
Replaced by a later reading on 14 November 2026 at 14:29 UTC. It was read before the correction of 14 November 2026 to the findings page, which is recorded in Room 06. The later reading is at https://teas.co.uk/under-the-hood/2026-11/. What follows is the reading as it was. Frozen edition, November 2026. Every figure on this page is as it was read on 14 November 2026 at 03:13 UTC. This page will not change, so a number quoted from it can be checked later. For today's figures see the live findings page.

Room 09 of 09 · seven findings in plain English

The findings.

teas.co.uk is a working tea shop that writes down every AI system that reads it and every visitor those systems send back. The other rooms are the evidence. This page is what the evidence says, in seven findings.

Every number on this page is read from the shop's own records when the page is built, and each finding links to the room that proves it. Nothing is modelled or estimated. Read on 14 November 2026.

169,702 PAGES SERVED TO NAMED AGENTS2,755 VISITS SENT BACK65.2 GB SENT TO MACHINES5 ORDERS RECORDED
Section 01

Who takes, and who gives back.

AI systems were served 169,702 pages from this shop and sent 2,755 visits back. The exchange is very uneven between companies. Agents naming Anthropic were served 15,014 pages and 5 visits came back from it: about 3,003 pages for each visit. Agents naming DuckDuckGo were served 2,334 pages and 934 visits came back: about 2.5.

FamilyPages served to its agentsVisits it sent backPages served for each visit
OpenAI
agents: oai-searchbot, gptbot, chatgpt-user · visits from: chatgpt
44,7441,04343
Microsoft
agents: bingbot · visits from: bing-ai, copilot
41,10358371
Perplexity
agents: perplexitybot, perplexity-user · visits from: perplexity
32,415321,013
Amazon
agents: amazonbot
18,803none recordedwithdrawn from credit
Anthropic
agents: claudebot, claude-user, anthropic-ai, claude-web · visits from: claude
15,01453,003
Meta
agents: meta-externalagent, meta-externalfetcher
9,888none recordedno visit recorded
Google (AI agents only)
agents: googleother, google-extended · visits from: gemini
3,6584778
DuckDuckGo
agents: duckassistbot · visits from: ddg-ai
2,3349342.5
ByteDance
agents: bytespider
1,648none recordedno visit recorded
Other named agents
agents: ccbot, youbot, cohere, generic
86none recordedno visit recorded
Mistral
agents: mistralai-user, mistral
7none recordedno visit recorded
xAI
agents: grokbot, xai-grok · visits from: grok
21too few to compare
Brave
visits from: brave-ai
none recorded93no agent recorded
Kagi
visits from: kagi
none recorded16no agent recorded
Alibaba Qwen
visits from: qwen
none recorded1no agent recorded
Pages column sums to 169,702 served reads across 25 named agents, the Room 03 totalVisits column sums to 2,755 AI referred sessions, the Room 03 total

Pages: the citation log grouped by agent, 2 Jun 2026 to 14 Nov 2026; a page counts when the server answered 200 or 206 and sent bytes. Visits: the session table, 10 May 2026 to 14 Nov 2026; a browser session whose referring address or campaign tag named an AI surface. Live, read at this render.

Read this table with four cautions. One: these are two tables with no shared key. No visit is matched to a page that was read, so the last column compares scale and proves no cause. Two: the windows start on different days, but all 2,755 visits fall inside the pages window, so the comparison is like for like. Three: a visit is only as certain as its evidence. 1,125 are graded verified, 1,513 probable, 59 possible and 58 unknown; DuckDuckGo, Bing, Brave and Kagi serve AI answers and ordinary search from the same address, so their visits are graded probable at best. Four: an agent name is what the software called itself, not a verified company, and Bingbot also feeds ordinary Bing search. Google's main search crawler is not counted here at all.
Section 02

What the visits bought.

2,755 visits arrived from AI answers, and the visit tracker recorded 5 completed orders among them. A small number, published because it is the true one.

Visits from AI answers
2,755
10 May 2026 to 14 Nov 2026
Product pages viewed
417
In those visits
Add to basket actions
30
In those visits
Completed orders
5
Recorded by the visit tracker

Source: the session table, 10 May 2026 to 14 Nov 2026. Rule: sessions whose referring address or campaign tag named an AI surface; each step is counted on its own and never derived from the step above. Live.

The order count is a floor. Room 06 records that the visit tracker does not see every order, so no conversion rate is published anywhere in this study. Room 02 reads the order records themselves: of 161 paid orders since 10 May 2026, 5 arrived on a link an AI assistant showed, 1 was probably from an assistant and 1 was reported by the customer. An order placed after reading an AI answer and then typing our address carries no AI evidence at all, so the true figure may be higher.

Section 03

What feeding the machines costs.

This shop has sent 65.2 GB of content to 25 named machine agents. That is content shipped from our own server, measured in bytes, not a count of pages.

AgentPages servedData sent (MB)
bingbot41,10316,689.7
perplexitybot32,41411,424.1
claudebot14,94010,656.6
amazonbot18,8037,271.5
oai-searchbot22,2846,322.3
The five largest by data sent: 51.1 GB of the 65.2 GB

Source: the citation log grouped by agent, 2 Jun 2026 to 14 Nov 2026. Rule: the sum of bytes our server sent. Requests answered from the cache in front of the server never reach this log, so the figure is a floor. Live.

Section 04

A checkout for assistants that nobody has paid through.

Since 4 October 2026 an AI assistant can search this shop, compare teas, fill a basket and hand its person a checkout link. Assistants have used the tools. In the last 30 days no paid order has come through them. We publish the empty result because it is the result.

Tools on the server
26
Read from the server at this render
Tool calls answered
1,189
4 Oct 2026 to 13 Nov 2026 (completed UTC days)
Of which errors
65
Refusals and failures, same window
Checkout links opened
14
Opened in a browser, same window
Paid orders through an assistant
0
Last 30 days

Source: the service record of the teas.co.uk MCP server; completed UTC days; the shop's own tests are left out. Payment happens only on teas.co.uk, never inside an assistant. Live.

Section 05

Our own analytics were blind.

Roughly a quarter of the visitors ChatGPT sent in September and October 2026 were never counted, and of 94 orders only 4 carried the shop platform's own record of where they came from. Most shops have the same gaps and do not know it.

The first page came from the cache
A visitor from ChatGPT landed on a page served from the cache, so the visit never reached our server. Our counter then ignored the campaign tag carried by the next request and filed the visit as a click from our own pages. Fixed on 6 October 2026; the missed arrivals were rebuilt once from our own server logs.
Orders with no origin
Of 94 orders from June to early October 2026, 4 had the shop platform's own attribution, which needs marketing consent, and our tracker filed 60 as internal navigation. Every order now gets an origin record with its evidence.
Still open
Only 33 of 139 real orders reached the event tables the commerce columns are built from when this was measured on 7 August 2026. It is listed as outstanding, which is why no conversion rate appears in this study.

Source: the corrections record in Room 06, where each entry is dated, kept in the main text and never removed.

Section 06

Bots wearing famous names.

In September 2026 most requests to this server that called themselves GrokBot or MistralAI were scanners looking for passwords. They received an error and earned nothing. Anyone counting AI traffic by the name a request gives itself is counting these too.

This study records an agent under the name it gives and says so on every table: a name is a claim, not a verified company. What protects the figures is the rule that only a real page served is counted, and that an agent which breaks the published rules is withdrawn from credit with its history left in view.

Source: the mint record in Room 01 ("Borrowed names earn nothing") and the agent table in Room 03. Window: September 2026.

Section 07

The crawler that ignored the rules.

Amazonbot ignored the limits this shop published. Our log holds 21,796 requests from it, 18,803 of them recorded as served. Every one is kept on the record and counts towards nothing.

Requests logged
21,796
2 Jun 2026 to 14 Nov 2026
Recorded as served
18,803
Kept in full, in every per agent table
Withdrawn from credit
18,803
Removed from every total and ranking
Refused since
30 June 2026
A second, server level refusal was added on 3 August 2026

We also got this wrong ourselves, twice, and Room 06 keeps both corrections. We described Amazonbot as blocked while our own server was still answering it. And many rows recorded after the block carry a status our tracker had predicted instead of the one the server returned, so the served figure above overstates what Amazonbot received. Those rows have not been edited. The cache in front of the server still answers some of its requests, so we do not claim the refusal is total.

Source: the citation log, Amazonbot rows, 2 Jun 2026 to 14 Nov 2026, and the corrections record. Rule: every logged request, none credited. Live.

Take it

Charts and data you can use.

Each chart is a 1,200 by 630 image with the date and this address printed on it. Use them in an article or a post; a link back to this page is all we ask. The charts were drawn on 14 November 2026 from the figures on that day, so they match the frozen November edition, not today's live numbers.

The CSV holds one row for every closed day of the thank you mint, from the same ledger and rules as the tape in Room 01, which shows the latest 30 days. Live.

Quote it

How to quote these findings.

Cite it like this
teas.co.uk, “Under the Hood: the findings, November 2026 edition”, https://teas.co.uk/under-the-hood/2026-11/reading-1/. Figures as read on 14 November 2026 at 03:13 UTC; they do not change. Reuse is covered by our fair use and citation terms.
Who to ask
Lee Samuel Tucker founded teas.co.uk and runs this study on the shop's own server. About Lee. Questions and press: hello@teas.co.uk.
One more number
This shop publishes 42,973 quotable signposts for machines, and machines have reached 9,857 of them at least once. Room 05 has the count.
A real shop
Every number comes from a working tea shop: teas.co.uk, its rare and hard to find teas, its best sellers and the Tea Wiki.
Tea notes and stock updates

Useful tea notes, only when there is something to say.

Stock arrivals, buying notes and practical guidance from the catalogue. No filler, no daily noise, unsubscribe in one click.

By family

By moment

Brand of the monthHyson Seasonal taster packsHow the seasonal bundles work Tea of the Month ClubCurator-picked monthly box Find your tea60-second quiz 0 Basket £0.00
See all 402 products